By Paul Magdalino (ed)
1000 years in the past, the Byzantine Empire used to be attaining the peak of its revival as a mediaeval nation. the 10 contributions to this quantity through students from six eu nations re-examine key features of the empire's politics and tradition within the lengthy reign of the emperor Basil II.
Read Online or Download Byzantium in the Year 1000 PDF
Best interior decorating books
This is often the 1st in a seven-volume sequence, to be in line with The Jerusalem meetings. each one quantity is dedicated to a particular subject, the 1st 5 following the department of Spinoza's "Ethics, the 6th facing Spinoza's social and political suggestion and the concluding one with the philosopher's lifestyles and origins.
Supplying a brand new method of the examine of Ṭabarī's background, the main accomplished ancient paintings written via a classical Muslim historian, this booklet applies thoughts built via serious theorists and indicates a interpreting of historiographical fabric that's not essentially serious about reconstructing the evidence.
- To Each His Home: Inspired Interiors as Unique as Their Owners
- New Heaven and New Earth: Prophecy and the Millennium : Essays in Honour of Anthony Gelston (Supplements to Vetus Testamentum)
- The Kubjikamatatantra: Kulalikamnaya Version (Orientalia Rheno-Traiectina Vol 30)
- Joannes Sambucus and the Learned Image: The Use of the Emblem in Late-Renaissance Humanism. (Brill's Studies in Intellectual History)
Extra resources for Byzantium in the Year 1000
In Theophanu, ed. von Euw and Schreiner, II, 284–6; von Falkenhausen, “Gregor”, 232–4. 89 The exceptional nature of the concession of a Porphyrogenita to Vladimir is made clear by Macrides, “Dynastic Marriages”, 270–3. See also F. Kämpfer, ‘Eine Residenz für Anna Porphyrogenneta’, Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas 41 (1993), 105–08. 90 Povest’, ed. I. Petrukhin, Drevniaia Rus’: narod, kniaz’ia, religiia (Iz istorii russkoi kul’tury, tom 1 (Drevniaia Rus’)) (Moscow, 2000), 259–61. 91 The princely halls in brick and stone were raised by the same ‘masters’ as built the adjoining church dedicated to the Mother of God—perhaps the feast of her Assumption— and they hailed from Byzantium.
Studien zur politischen Ikonographie. Festschrift für Hansmartin Schwarzmaier zum fünfundsechzigsten Geburtstag (Sigmaringen, 1997), 5–9, 12–15, 27–32, 46–8. g. T. Reuter, Germany in the Early Middle Ages (London, 1991), 148–77; G. Althoff, Die Ottonen. Königsherrschaft ohne Staat (Stuttgart, 2000), 118–36; Franklin and Shepard, Emergence, 139–52. E. Walker, “The ‘Crusade’ of John Tzimisces in the light of new Arabic evidence”, Byzantion 47 (1977), 306; Brett, Fatimids, 308. , 222, 295–6, 308–15.
42 At about the same time the Rus prince Sviatoslav dismissed Byzantine territorial rights even more sweepingly. 44 Thus Byzantium more or less simultaneously faced forceful challenges to its rights and sphere of influence on two of its main approaches. Within the space of about twenty years, the two bases indispensable for dominion and indirect influence in the west and the north came under assault, and Cherson—unlike Bari in 968—actually succumbed to its besiegers c. 988. Moreover, Otto I, upon being crowned imperator in Rome in February 962, adopted the basileus’ style of representation on his seals.